![]() Finally, participants will be encouraged to lay plans for using Webb’s DOK as a rubric for constructing new quizzes and exams, developing discussion questions, and writing student learning outcomes tied to the PA Core Standards with the goal of increasing instructional rigor. In this way, participants are brought to understand the implications for DOK levels for assessment items, performance tasks, inquiry questions, eligible content, and standards. Workshop participants also explore Karin Hess’s Cognitive Rigor Matrix, which applies Webb’s DOK levels - Recall and Reproduction, Skills and Concepts, Strategic Thinking and Reasoning, and Extended Thinking - to Bloom’s Cognitive Process Dimensions, with an emphasis on its use by classroom teachers and districts conducting alignment studies. They also discuss Webb’s criteria for such an analysis, leading to a working, results-oriented reassessment of local curricular alignment with the PA Core Standards and a re-evaluation of the formative assessments currently in place. In this session, edInsight consultants engage teachers in utilizing the DOK paradigm to analyze the cognitive demand and complexity - the “brain sweat” - in instructional activities and assessment tasks. However, asking students to “create” a model of the human eye based on a textbook model requires little independent thinking and thus little or no transfer of knowledge. A general definition for each of the four (Webb) Depth-of-Knowledge levels is followed by Table 1, which provides further specification and examples for each of the DOK levels. ![]() “Create,” for example, occupies a high rung on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Norman Webb's 'Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas' include: Language Arts (Reading, Writing), Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies. Because the highest (fourth) level is rare or even absent in most standardized assessments, reviewers usually made distinctions among DOK levels 1, 2 and 3. Students will extend patterns, find the missing term(s) in a pattern or describe rules for patterns (numbers, pictures, tables, words) from real-world and mathematical problems. Four levels of depth of knowledge were used for this analysis. Depth of Knowledge Levels Each level of complexity measures a student's depth of knowledge. Table 2: Depth of Knowledge Sample Chart - Using the Same Content Statement Across DOK levels/Grade spans (Kentucky Department of Education, 2005) MA-05-5.1.1. It is defined as the complexity or depth of understanding that is required to answer an assessment question. ![]() While Bloom’s Taxonomy relies on the verb, Webb’s DOK extends beyond the verb to what follows. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) was developed through research by Norman L. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |